Dear Mr Garrett,
A dam on the Mary River threatens our World Heritage.
If a dam at Traveston Crossing had been operating
during 2006/2007, flows from the Mary River to
the Great Sandy Strait would have been reduced
to less than 25% of the natural state. Yet the
Queensland Government says the Great Sandy Strait,
Hervey Bay and Fraser Island would not be affected.
The impacts on the Great Sandy Strait and RAMSAR
wetlands have not been adequately addressed. Rainfall
is predicted to decline and if it were to fall
by only 10%, stream flows into the dam would be
a cut by a third. Further reductions in environmental
flow would be inevitable.
Already, worrying trends across the last decade
have seen the Mary River flows cut by around half,
similar to what has occurred in the Murray River
system.
The dam threaten the survival of a number of
endangered species, notably the Queensland Lungfish,
Mary River Turtle and Mary River Cod with only
untested mitigation measures being proposed. Announcing
a Centre for research into these species is a
welcome move but this research needs to be carried
out before contemplation of a dam rather than
after one is built.
Traveston Crossing Dam would, at best, supply
less than 10% of SEQ’s future water needs.
There are viable alternatives, not adequately
considered by the government, that would give
South East Queensland a truly secure and ecologically
sustainable water supply with significantly lower
triple bottom line impacts.